pattern comparison

pattern comparison, patterns, sewing

Looking at the shapes of pattern pieces

Some weeks ago I decided to sew my daughters some puff sleeved tees in anticipation of summer eventually arriving (yes, more non-seasonal sewing). I pulled out what felt like every knit tee pattern that I owned, plus those with sleeves drafted for puff sleeves. I thought that some of you would be interested to see the differences in shapes.

Pattern shape comparisons

There are two of the puff sleeve pattern pieces that I looked at. Both are drafted for the same size bodice. I had already decided that I was happy to mix and match puff sleeve pattern pieces with bodice pieces as the puff at the sleeve head allows some forgiveness in setting the sleeve into the armscye. The two sleeve pieces are quite different shapes – I figure that the ‘slash and spread’ of the initial fitted sleeve that I assume the puff sleeve piece is based on was done a bit differently for each of them. This would also result in different amounts of gathering at the sleeve head versus the sleeve hem.  If you look closely you can also see that both these pattern pieces have notches marked for the shoulder point, front and back.  I always like to see this in sleeve drafting.

Pattern shape comparisons

I also looked at the bodice of four different tee patterns. These are all adjusted to fit Clare, so have been shortened through the body, and some have also been graded across a couple of sizes for improved fit.  So essentially these are all for the same person.  I was intrigued in the differences in shaping.  It’s not just the difference in shaping through the body for bust/waist/hips, which I think was pretty much expected (some of the tees are described as fitted, whereas others as relaxed).  It’s the armhole shaping, the shoulder slope, and the neckline shaping that intrigues me!  This really gives me a refreshed perspective on what people often call ‘simple’ patterns.  When there are few pattern pieces, they really do need to be well drafted – and there’s more to it than you’d first think.  Just look at the variables in those pattern pieces – all for a tee shirt front.  And each of those little differences will make a difference in how they fit on different bodies.

It’s a reminder to me that there is no such as thing as a ‘perfect’ tee pattern.  You need to find the one that works best for your own shape, and the overall look that you are going for.  So isn’t it nice to have options!  There are many free tee patterns out there too – they can be a good way to try out different pattern designers and drafts.  I bet that with a bit of googling you could find a tee shirt comparison post where someone has sewn up a variety of tee patterns in the same fabric.  That would really show how the differences in pattern shapes translates on the three-dimensional wearer.  I’m not volunteering to do that comparison, by the way 😉

I’ll be back in a couple of blog posts to show you the tees that I did end up making for Clare and Stella!

adult's clothing, Cashmerette, pattern comparison, sewing

Mashing the Plantain and Concord

I really like the (free) Deer and Doe Plantain tee.  And I really like the Cashmerette Concord tee.  But neither one is quite perfect.  Straight away let me acknowledge that my definition of ‘perfect’ does seem to change as fashions (and my body!) change.  So I’m really talking about perfect for me right now.  I thought that maybe I should compare the two patterns.

alltechdrawshopfiy-03_550x

That’s the line drawing for the Concord.  I tend to make the scoop neck, ‘cropped’ version, grading out a size through the waist.

plantain-t-shirt-pattern

And that’s the Plantain.  I haven’t sewn the updated version but I doubt that it is much different.  Deer and Doe describe it as fitted at the shoulders and flaring at the hips. I grade it out through the waist and back in at the hips as well.

Mashing the Plantain and Concord tees

And that photo is my graded Concord and Plantain together. Remember, these are both tees that I really like. I was fascinated to see where the shapes of a ‘simple tee’ vary!  I decided to mash the body of the Plantain with the armscye, shoulders and neckline of the Concord.

Mashing the Plantain and Concord tees

I also needed to consider the sleeve. Obviously I’d need the Concord for the sleeve cap, to fit into the Concord armscye, but what about the width? In the end I blended between the two a little, to give just a smidge more room through the forearm.

Mashing the Plantain and Concord tees

I then sewed up the tee that I was wearing under the York pinafore a few blog posts ago. And it really did feel perfect! The shoulder and bust fit that I love of the Concord, with the skimming fit (it’s not flared on me as my belly takes the room) of the Plantain. Then I sewed up another! Also great! The fabric is quality viscose/lycra knit from The Cloth Shop, Ivanhoe. I made the neckband a little wider this time around too.

Concord Plantain mashup tee

But I wasn’t finished yet! I’d bought some lovely rib merino knit from The Cloth Shop as well. Perfect for another mash!

Concord Plantain tee mash

Well, it was perfect once I remembered that it was a RIB knit.  Incredibly super stretchy! I had to unpick and shorten the neckband twice before I had an acceptable result.  So this one, although sewn from exactly the same pattern pieces as the other two tees, is a looser fit with a much more open neckline. So, is it a Plancord or a Contain tee?  Or a Conplancordtain?  Plancontaincord?  No matter what I call it, I reckon that I’ll keep on sewing it!

Liesl + Co, pattern comparison, sewing

Liesl + Co Maritime versus Simplicity 1366

A few months ago Jenny asked me how I thought the Liesl + Co Maritime top compared to Simplicity 1366 view D.  Well, I have finally taken some photos of the main pattern pieces so that you can see for yourself.  For reference, here are line drawings of both patterns.

Liesl + Co Maritime Knit Top

Simplicity 1366 (view D)

Simplicity 1366 view D line drawing

A few salient points:

  • The Maritime Knit Top is designed for knits, whereas Simplicity 1366 View D is designed for wovens.
  • The Maritime Knit Top has a shaped, interfaced facing to finish the neckline.  Simplicity 1366 uses a bias cut strip of fabric as a neckline facing.
  • The Maritime Knit Top has side seam vents.  Simplicity 1366 has no side seam vents but is shorter.

So, to the photos!  First, the front pieces side by side.

2015-08-30 11.17.49

And with one pattern piece on top of the other.

2015-08-30 11.18.15

Next, the back pieces side by side.

2015-08-30 11.20.08

And with one pattern piece on top of the other.

2015-08-30 11.20.28

And now for the sleeves! First, side by side.

2015-08-30 11.15.46

Then one on top of the other.

2015-08-30 11.15.19

I found this to be quite an interesting process. Although at first glance these appear to be two very similar patterns, there are a number of differences in the drafting when you compare each of them side by side.  I think that much of this would be due to the different fabrics they are drafted for, but otherwise it’s the subtleties that make one simple top still look different from another.

Just as a reminder for how the finished tops look, here is the first Maritime top that I made, without any modification:

Liesl + Co Maritime knit top in fabric from Darn Cheap Fabrics

And this is Simplicity 1366, in a woven fabric, also without any modification.

Simplicity 1366 top in size 12

I’ve sewn Simplicity 1366 a few times in a knit, with lengthened sleeves, and I’ve also sewn the Maritime top (always in a knit) with lengthened sleeves as well. Both these are great basic patterns to have in my collection. I might just sew another 1366 today now – but with an added inch to the length. I’d be interested to hear your observations on the differences between these two patterns. Has anyone else sewn both?